Tested COMPRESS=NO
Tested different CKPTPAGE and CKPTLINE..
NO luck..

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Cobe Xu <cob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jack,
>
> As previous thread mentioned, COMPRESS could be the cause of some CPU
> cycles.
> So we're going to test turn off COMPRESS, will see if JES2 cpu can relief..
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Jack Schudel <j...@nersp.cns.ufl.edu>wrote:
>
>> Cobe Xu:
>>
>> Have you checked to make sure that both compression and compaction are
>> turned off for the printer?
>> (Do a $DU,Rn.PRn command and look for CMPCT=NO,COMPRESS=NO.)
>> By default JES2's RJE printer driver scans for repeated characters to
>> compress out of the data stream.
>> That made a lot of sense back in the days of 4800 bit/sec modems, but is
>> probably just wasted cycles with today's communication speeds.
>>
>> If that does not help, you will need to find a way to move the printer
>> driver out of your main JES2 task.
>> Are you running multiple MVS images sharing the JES2 spool?
>> Can you connect the printer to JES2 on one of the images that is not
>> running CICS as its primary workload?
>>
>> If you are constrained to a single MVS image things get more complicated.
>> One approach would be to run a secondary JES2 subsystem to drive the
>> printer, and define that JES2 subsystem with a lower WLM importance.
>> The secondary JES2 could share your main spool, or you could run an NJE
>> connection between the primary and secondary.
>>
>> If CICS really is your most important workload, and you have controls in
>> place to prevent runaway transactions, some sites have even gone so far as
>> running their primary JES2 system at a lower importance than CICS.
>> Personally I don't think that is a wise thing to do, but it really does
>> depend on the environment.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>>
>> /jack
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cobe Xu" <cob...@gmail.com>
>> Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
>>
>> To: <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu>
>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: can limit JES2 RJE work?
>>
>>
>>   Hi Greg,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the APAR information.
>>> I checked with JES2 PERFDATA(PCESTAT). We don't have high cpu% for SAPI,
>>> but
>>> true for RMT.PRT PCE, over 50%.
>>> Need to further confirm if our problem match this APAR.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Greg Shirey <wgshi...@benekeith.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could it be APAR OA33407?
>>>>
>>>> ****************************************************************
>>>> * PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: High CPU usage for output device PCEs,  *
>>>> *                      such as SAPI PCEs, when selecting work  *
>>>> *                      with user routing.                      *
>>>> ****************************************************************
>>>> * RECOMMENDATION:                                              *
>>>> ****************************************************************
>>>> The WSROUT routine in HASPSERV is not distinguishing between a
>>>> real JOE and an artificial JOE (JOA).  So it incorrectly
>>>> determines for a JOA that it cannot utilize the user routing
>>>> information to do work selection, so significantly more devices
>>>> are posted than should be.  When the device attempts to do work
>>>> selection it cannot find JOEs that match.  This incorrect
>>>> processing results in excessive CPU usage.
>>>> This problem affects the following output devices when they
>>>> select work with user routing: printers, punches, SYSOUT
>>>> transmitters, and SYSOUT API (SAPI).
>>>>
>>>> Greg Shirey
>>>> Ben E. Keith Company
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: "Cobe Xu" <cob...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>>>>
>>>> Recently, we have a problem when sending large amount spool files (about
>>>> 2.5
>>>> million lines) to RJE printer, as the work caused JES2 consumes lots of
>>>> CPU,
>>>> therefore impacted
>>>> the CICS online performance.
>>>> We consider to limit JES2 address space CPU, using WLM resource group,
>>>> but
>>>> this will suppress other JES2 process as well. So, any idea to limit RJE
>>>> work only?
>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cobe Xu
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>> z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst
>>> z/OS System Programmer
>>> Email: cob...@gmail.com
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cobe Xu
>
> Best Regards
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst
> z/OS System Programmer
> Email: cob...@gmail.com
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>   *"Impart fishing is much better than just donate fishes"*
>
>


-- 
Cobe Xu

Best Regards
-----------------------------------------------------------
z/OS Performance & Capacity Analyst
z/OS System Programmer
Email: cob...@gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to