In <p06240804ca73962f3742@[192.168.1.11]>, on 08/19/2011
   at 12:30 AM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9...@panix.com> said:

>If you use QSAM (as opposed to BSAM) you would not have access to 
>this information and I do not think QSAM is smart enough to monitor 
>the track balance and write short blocks to fill up the track for VB 
>and FB records - I think it is for VBS and I know it only writes 
>BLKSIZE-only records for FBS except at close where it flushes out the
> short partial block

Neither BSAM nor QSAM will automatically truncate blocks to fit the
remaining track capacity.
 
-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to