> That much said, I think that Jay's FAQ 2.02 makes it pretty clear what requires a license and what does not.
No it doesn't - and that's precisely the point. http://www.hercules-390.org/hercfaq.html#2.02 "3) Running under the terms of a disaster recovery provision of the OS license (but I really don't recommend depending on Hercules to be your disaster recovery solution!)." > I kinda wish Phil had counted to ten before pressing the 'send' key this > time. I'll stop complaining about this nonsense when Jay stops claiming it. It's downright dishonest and may result in someone doing something they believe may be excused when - in some jurisdictions - it's actually a FELONY. I couldn't give a stuff about IBM's lawyers (and that ought to be obvious from other comments I've made) but I am concerned that someone new to this whole discussion will believe this "disaster recovery" bollocks. It's twaddle - there is no such provision. -- Phil Payne http://www.isham-research.co.uk +44 7833 654 800 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
