I'm beginning to wondering... :)
But I started in februari 1979...

 
Regards, 
Thomas Berg 
_________________________________________ 
Thomas Berg   Specialist   A M   SWEDBANK 

> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] För
> Frank Swarbrick
> Skickat: den 13 februari 2012 19:27
> Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Ämne: Re: Archaic allocation in JCL (Was: Physical record size query)
> 
> Are you sure you are a mainframer?
> 
> 
> 
> >________________________________
> > From: Thomas Berg <thomas.b...@swedbank.se>
> >To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> >Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 4:27 AM
> >Subject: Archaic allocation in JCL   (Was: Physical record size query)
> >
> >I can't understand why we STILL need to specify SPACE= (etc) for an
> allocation of a dataset.
> >You normally don't do that in other OS (platforms), You always (both
> principally and in practice) want to allocate as much as is needed during
> execution
> >
> >If for backward compatibility it can't be done automatically, why not
> introduce a new keyword like e g "SPACE=ANY" ?
> >
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Thomas Berg
> >_________________________________________
> >Thomas Berg   Specialist   A M   SWEDBANK
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to