hal9...@panix.com (Robert A. Rosenberg) writes:
> No Bill is right. OS/VS2 Release 2 WAS MVS like OS/VS2 Release 1 was
> SVS. SVS was OS/360 MVT with Virtual Addresses (SVS was a single 16MB
> Address Space with which was divided into smaller areas for the
> programs to use, just like MVT). MVS made the program's area into
> duplicate address ranges which sat between and shared the low and high
> address ranges which belonged to the Operating System.

old post about os/vs2 release 1 (svs), release 2 (mvs), and glide path
to release 3 ... operating system for future system
http://www.galric.com/~lynn/2011d.html#73

past future system posts
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#futuresys

really long-winded post about the transition to MVS and pointer-passing
API causing enormous problems ... involved image of MVS occupying
8mbytes of every application virtual address space ... in order for
kernel code to access application data ... and common segment for
passing data between applications and semi-priviledged subsystems now in
separate virtual address spaces ... and there needing to be sufficient
sized common segment to handle all applications & subsystems ... larger
installations were having common segment threatening to increase to
6mbyte ... leaving only 2mbytes for application in every "private"
16mbyte virtual address space.
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012b.html#66

3081 & 370xa with 31bit addressing was taking so long to get out after
future system failure ... that dual-address space was retrofitted to
3033 in attempt to somewhat alleviate the common segment pressure on
what little was left for application use out of 16mbytes. some
discussion getting out 3081 (and eventually 31bit addressing) after
future system failure
http://www.jfsowa.com/computer/memo125.htm

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to