I thought os/vs1 was MFT with virtual storage.
Fred
________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Fri 2/17/2012 12:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: 5 Byte Device Addresses?
In <p06240802cb635acf006e@[192.168.1.11]>, on 02/16/2012
at 08:23 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <hal9...@panix.com> said:
>No Bill is right.
No.
>OS/VS2 Release 2 WAS MVS
But MVS wasn't OS/VS2 Release 2.
>like OS/VS2 Release 1 was SVS.
The difference is that SVS was *only* release 1; MVS was *not* only
release 2.
>SVS was OS/360 MVT with Virtual Addresses
That depends on what "was" was. SVS was missing OS/360 component and
had some significant differences from OS/360 MVT over and above
paging.
BTDT,GTS
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
