I have found it to be very unfriendly. I wish IBM would have incorporated the good features of ETR. I have not gotten emails when the record is updated ( my profile requests such), so I have to logon (twice) just to check - this is a time waster to me. I opened a SR to the SR Help Desk, but I do not think they understood the problem. I have found it incredibly difficult to choose a component. For example, using z/OS as a keyword and selecting the "show only entitled" check box results in 475 choices. Browsing through that list, I see far more products for which I am NOT licensed. Response time is slower than ETR. In short, ETR much better. --- On Thu, 6/7/12, Dick Bond <dickbond...@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Dick Bond <dickbond...@gmail.com> Subject: SR To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Date: Thursday, June 7, 2012, 5:12 PM Anyone else as disgusted with the "SR" replacement as I am? Half time, it doesn't updae the record correctly and you have to sign-on twice just to get into the thing. On a positive note, you can download files which is nice but does not make up for the generally poor design. Makes me wonder if anyone at IBM bothered to look at the "ETR" function and how easy that was to use before designing "SR". I can't help but feel IBM is shooting itself in the foot by deploying stuff like "SR" while making it worse that the prior product. Sorry for rant but I see "SR" just one component of "The Rise and Fall of IBM". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
