Don't forget our old friends in auditing. We are seeing these kinds of questions.
I agree: it is a management issue. And audit trumps politics. More, SOX holds that the managers of the folks that get sneaky can be held accountable. My $0.02. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Rutledge Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:21 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Redirecting Software Functionality Other departments that have interest in this sort of behavior, at least where I work, are Loss Prevention and Risk Management. Bob David Andrews wrote: > On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:14 -0600, Ed Gould wrote: > >>But programmers can be fairly tricky. I have seen iebcopy of the >>contents of the compiler (as well as the syslib of LE) done so they >>can get around restrictions (like your entry). > > > Then take 'em to HR and have 'em shot. Seriously, this is a management > issue, not a technical one. Implement roadblocks to prevent simple > mistakes, then put a couple bullets aside to take care of recalcitrant > individuals. Zero tolerance: problem solved. > > You CANNOT keep people around who knowingly bust license terms. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
