Charles wrote: > I'm asking as the architect of a vendor product - is this what you customer > sysprogs would like? Would you like vendor products to get their > parametization from a member of the PARMLIB concatenation? Would that be a > good thing - one less "special" parm file to keep track of? Or would you > perceive it as making the "owners" of application products mess around in a > "system" parameter concatenation?
See Marks post - that way we can do as we wish, and everyone's happy. Ed wrote: > I think he wants to be able to concatenate the system's logical parmlib > to other, normal RECFM=FB, LRECL=80 partitioned data sets via JCL. It's > a cool idea and *not* something for which kicking vendors is the > appropriate avenue of attack. Mmmm - missed that in the first DD. Regardless, above comment stands. Given the LOADxx member David proposed, I'm sure he could also live with what Mark suggested. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
