In a recent note, Rich Smrcina said: > Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:19:47 -0600 > > Although technically correct that Putty can not do 3270, if the original > poster can ssh into a Linux machine with the x3270 suite installed, they > can use c3270 to access their 3270 based hosts. c3270 is ncurses based > and should work over a standard telnet/ssh connection. > Does this not thwart any supposed security objective in the original Putty requirement? Or is it presumed the Linux-mainframe connection is secure (a fair bet if the "Linux machine" is an LPAR connected via Hipersocket)? Or am I simply overlooking an ironic content in your remark?
-- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
