Paul Gilmartin wrote: > In a recent note, McKown, John said: > > I think you have that right! I get these stupid messages > when I run a > > batch job which issues DFHSM commands. Makes me right angry! And > > PROFILE NOITERCOM does __not__ stop them. I'd like to give > > the DFHSM developer who wrote this a sound thrashing. > It would appear that the TPUT macro: > ... is being passed the wrong value in the ASIDLOC parameter.
They evidently also failed to specify the LOWP option, which is why PROFILE NOINTERCOM doesn't work. This is another part of the "attitude": "Of course messages *I* issue are of critical importance, so I'll send them with high priority". Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
