Without mining thru previous posts--I thought the dangling issue was the last system down, where SFM no longer has the power to initiate a cleanup. Isn't that the case where system reset is proposed as necessary?
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> 04/21/2006 01:59 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU> To IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU cc Subject Re: Fw: IXC102A automated by SFM ? On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:23:56 -0700, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >As I understand this explanation, system reset is a definitive manual >action that guarantees the 'down-ness' of a system. Like the hunter >'making sure' his buddy is really dead. But a total lack of vital signs, >like the TV-familiar solid hum of the life monitor, serves the same >purpose. Plus the red icons on the HMC. > >We've been running sysplexes--parallel, basic, and mono--for 10 years. >Without a standard practice of system reset, have we just been lucky? > Are you saying you don't have an SFM policy that takes care of it for you? Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
