Peter Relson wrote:
Would F LLA, REFRESH (link list refresh)...
Be aware that a full LLA refresh is overkill.
F LLA,UPDATE=nn where CSVLLAxx contains a suitable update statement for the
specific data set requires far less processing and does what you want.
It uses fewer computer resources for sure. But, it requires additional
human resources to prepare the CSVLLAxx member. A full LLA refresh takes
a *lot* less total clock time than does manually editing a CSVLLAxx
member and issuing F LLA,UPDATE=xx.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
