Something like F LLA,UPDATE=DSN=some.data.set.name would be very useful and could help eliminate manual effort of creating a PARMLIB member and the attendant clutter of members in PARMLIB.
Don Imbriale On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 04:33:07 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Peter Relson wrote: >>> Would F LLA, REFRESH (link list refresh)... >>> >> >> Be aware that a full LLA refresh is overkill. >> F LLA,UPDATE=nn where CSVLLAxx contains a suitable update statement for the >> specific data set requires far less processing and does what you want. >> > >It uses fewer computer resources for sure. But, it requires additional >human resources to prepare the CSVLLAxx member. A full LLA refresh takes >a *lot* less total clock time than does manually editing a CSVLLAxx >member and issuing F LLA,UPDATE=xx. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
