In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/28/2006 at 09:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>And I would counter that the best way to get a requirement reject by >IBM is to tell them how it should be implemented. There is a difference between suggesting implementations and telling IBM how to implement. I've seen requirements rejected due to *not* suggesting a solution. The Devil is in the details; you need to have a good problem statement and you need to be clear that the suggestions are only suggestions. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html