The OP was a little unclear, as others have noted. I was thinking of compiler MAP and XREF. Since LET is a link option, I guess he meant MAP and XREF on the link. No, those should not have a significant effect on EXCPs.
I was referring to COBOL compiles, where XREF doubles the size of the SYSPRINT listing, thereby roughly doubling SYSPRINT EXCPs, not matter what the block size. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 10:05 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Overhead caused by LE options with (XREF, MAP, LET) On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:11:58 -0700, Charles Mills wrote: >As someone else said, these are compile (and for LET, link) options. "...and that will double the EXCPs...". Say what?!?!? If XREF leads to a doubling of the EXCPs then you must not be blocking your output. If you really want to improve the that performance, block the output files and avoid the EXCP doubling. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
