Yes, they are in separate libraries. I tried copying OTHRPROG into my.library.one, and that did NOT solve the problem.
Apparently that's not how CALL works, at least not based on my experimentation. Could I have fat-fingered it? I can't re-write SOMEPROG. I don't have the source code. Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 4:40 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Allocating "STEPLIB" in TSO In a recent note, Charles Mills said: > Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:33:19 -0700 > > CALL my.library.one(SOMEPROG) > > And it works just fine, so far as it goes. Subsequently, while SOMEPROG is > executing, it would like to LOAD or LINK OTHRPROG. OTHRPROG is in > SOME.OTHER.LIBRARY that is not in my STEPLIB or link pack concatenation and > for political/procedural reasons is not going to be put there right away. > Are SOMEPROG and OTHERPROG in different libraries? Ugh! Otherwise, I'd be somewhat surprised. I had thought CALL did a DYNALLOC for my.library.one, then an ATTACH using the generated DDNAME as a TASKLIB argument. Can you allocate a concatenation of my.library.one and SOME.OTHER.LIBRARY, then write the program to ATTACH SOMEPROG,TASKLIB=concatenation? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html