In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/06/2006
at 04:11 PM, Phil Sidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm thinking the infringement may have to do with the supposed
>implementation by PSI of the instructions in the hardware by
>reprogramming the behavior of the Itanium processor. We used to call
>this, um, microcode?
> This might be what eClipz is and IBM might have intellectual
>property in this area.
I imagine that the likes of RCA and TRW might be sceptical or its
originality, if so. Prior art and all that.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html