On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:01 -0600, Russell Witt wrote: > I am so sorry that the level-1 tech did not explain himself clearly. > You ARE at r11.5 already. The 5 PTF's you listed as being missing from > the PRE/SUP list (QO75520, QO72923, QO72131...) ARE r11.5 PTF's that > you already have applied to your system. And they cannot be applied > unless you have applied the maintenance that brings you up to the > r11.5 level. I am so sorry the level-1 tech did not explain that > correctly. You are at r11.5 and should be applying the r11.5 versions > of those PTF's.
Which goes all the way back to Barrys (original ???) contention. "The only problem I have had with CA-1 is CA's insistence on keeping the same FMID when changing versions." FWIW I'm in total agreement. CA-1 are *waaaay* out in front of all the other CA product groups with regard to SMP. But they are still apparently constrained by corporate fiats. This produces some *really* inappropriate (SMP) packaging. As to the original subject, nothing to contribute as I've never been responsible for a site using RMM. Yep - an indication of how CA1 "owned" this segment of the market previously. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
