Thanks, Tom. I have my control-m administrator chasing down that line. Unfortunately he prefers to go through the contractor that installed it instead of going straight to BMC so it's not the speediest response time. I was looking to this group to see if anybody else had seen the problem and if the behavior of O versus ST panels was something that actually made sense to somebody - as it doesn't to me. Maybe it is the cold weather (14 below this morning) that is causing my brain to not compute. :-)
I'll crank it up a notch with the admin here and have him skip the contractor. Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: JES confusion on a specific job On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:03:34 -0600, Pommier, Rex R. wrote: >I can't categorically say that it is something Control-M is doing to >me, but it sure is suspicious that we started having this problem about >the same time we implemented the scheduler. Rex, I do believe that it is Control-M that is doing that (on purpose or at least not entirely by accident). If you contact your vendor software representative (Erik maybe? Say "Hi" for me if it is, please.) you should be able to get an explanation from him/her that makes sense. (I've worked at a Control-M site before and I saw that behavior... I believe that's how they figure out the job's success/failure, etc.) You should also be able to get the issue straightened out then, too. Everything else is a waste of your time on this issue. -- Tom Schmidt Madison, WI ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
