In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/23/2007
at 04:10 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Just make it a private/undocumented interface (as has been done with
>other internal functions such as SuperLocate and others) and
>restrict its use to ONLY the Initiator (and possibly other IBM
>routines that could be more efficient by its availability).
That is an unnecessary and insufficient condition. I see no risk in
making it a GUPI, while making it private does not resolve the problem
of a GRSplex with some members not having the functionality. By all
means submit a requirement, with a sound business case, but don't ask
for an early implementation; if you got one you'd be sorry. It will
undoubtedly take IBM some serious work to get the GRS aspect right.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
