Kees
Didn't IBM wait until there was a clear definition of what a system that
claimed to be a "UNIX" system did before implementing it? - and then
discovered - as I remember a colleague crowing in the corridor - that it was
the only *true* "UNIX", all other pretenders being deficient in some way
when checked against the "official" definition.
Now, please direct us to the equivalent statement of what a system that
claims to be a "Windows" system does.
Chris Mason
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: mainframe = superserver
...
why not Windows as the next
environment to be hosted (in the broadest sense of the word) on
z/series?
Kees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
