"Peter Relson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED] om>... > Sam makes a good point. If we report on usage above 100% we should allow > you to > specify a value > 100%. > Regarding Barbara's points about the ASM and XCF checks,, We will check > into > them (again, I presume). The ASM check intentionally is designed on an > individual data set basis. And that is why adding an additional data set > has no > bearing on the exception.
Peter, I had the "old" HC under SA installed, but found it hardly useful, so I was happy to read the announcement in 1.7 (I think) that it had been improved a lot, but now it appears not to be at its final goal, so I hope user comments will be handled seriously. About your answer above: why do you check a single PGDS utilization? I think it hardly hirts when one PGDS is over some limit if the total configuration is within limit? If I remember correctly what Greg Dyke explained about PGDS selection queues and groups when discussing PGDSs on different devicetypes, the overutilized one will not be selected anymore, because of the smaller chance of finding enough contigious slots. So if the rest of the pageconfiguration is well behaving, there is in fact no problem to report on. Besides that, the question is what we can do about it, as Barbara already mentioned. And do I understand it correctly that you don't check the utilization of the entire pageconfiguration? I think that is the most important item. I just noticed this week that an extra message IRA205I has been added to notify if the Pageconfiguration is 50% full. ASM is always issuing messages about the utilization of the total pageconfiguration, so I assume that is the most important thing to monitor. Kees. ********************************************************************** For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 33014286 ********************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
