Hi,
I think this might explain different perceptions of what is possible.
Case 1
HMIGRATE attempt for SMS managed dataset defined to APF by using the SMS
keyword
MIGRATE REQUEST 00019980 SENT TO DFSMSHSM
ARC1001I U06T03.LOAD.TEST.APFMIG MIGRATE FAILED, RC=0099, REAS=0014
ARC1299I UNSUPPORTED DATA SET FOR MIGRATION
Case 2
HMIGRATE attempt for SMS managed APF dataset defined to APF incorrectly
using an explicit DASD volser.
MIGRATE REQUEST 00019995 SENT TO DFSMSHSM
ARC1000I U06T03.LOAD.TEST.APFMIG MIGRATE PROCESSING ENDED
***
Now the second case of not using SMS but a volser works as far as APF is
concerned but DFSMShsm does not recognize it and WILL migrate it.
This wrinkle had not occurred to me until today reading seemingly
contradictory statements of fact.
The CSV_APF_EXISTS will flag the second case but it is ignored by
RACF_SENSITIVE_RESOURCES.
CHECK(IBMCSV,CSV_APF_EXISTS)
START TIME: 10/23/2007 20:03:57.740282
CHECK DATE: 20050720 CHECK SEVERITY: LOW
A problem was found with each APF list entry displayed.
VOLUME DSNAME ERROR
G10078 U06T03.LOAD.TEST.APFMIG DS is SMS-managed
DS is SMS-managed
The data set is SMS-managed, but the APF list entry specified a
volume.
If the APF list entry represents a SMS-managed data set but has
specified the volume parameter, the data set would not be
authorized if it were moved to a different volume. In order for
DFSMShsm to verify APF-authorization properly, the APF list
entry must indicate that the data set is SMS-managed.
I think you could make a good case for DFSMShsm not functioning
correctly. It should refuse to migrate both since using SMS is
recommended by not required by APF.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
System z Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
"Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..."
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 5:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Healthcheck ((IBMCSV,CSV_APF_EXISTS)
Staller, Allan wrote:
> Ed,
> Was this from auto-migration or command migration?
>
READY
hmig linklib
ARC1007I MIGRATE REQUEST 00000117 SENT TO DFSMSHSM
READY
ARC1001I userid.LINKLIB MIGRATE FAILED, RC=0099, REAS=0014
ARC1299I UNSUPPORTED DATA SET FOR MIGRATION
READY
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
