On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:41:57 -0500, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... >> This is correct if you "legally" got disabled. If you got disabled >> using the nonsupported way using STNSM, your FRR will be entered >> enabled. ... >Yes, I got that. The point is that the fine manual makes no such >distinction. >... Yabut, yabut, .... This thread has discussed one area where violating supported procedures results in undocumented behavior. Are you sure you want IBM to try to document *all* such effects? The fine manual would contain little else (and would still be incomplete). Ok. FRRs are maybe special - you're talking close-to-the-metal code that is trying to save the system's cookies. Maybe it should mention exceptions to expected behavior such as being discussed here. But it would still be an incomplete list. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
