On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:28:22 -0000, Phil Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone from the Hercules team read IBM's rather stunning admission > (on the above page - paragraph 176) that there is a "confidential version" > of the PoP? Their words, not mine. This is bizarre. Why is it a "stunning admission" that there is a confidential version of the POPs? Lynn Wheeler has been mentioning this Script/GML based book that could be printed as either the "customer" or the "full" version, for *years*, on this very list. And well known IBMers have talked very openly at SHARE and in other non-confidential contexts about the "real" book, vs the published version, though of course they do not discuss its content. And what is the relevance to Hercules? Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
