Lizette,

>From the Storage side I would disagree that imbed and replicate degrade 
>performance. Yes, REPLICATE wastes space, and neither actually improve 
>performance, but there is no degradation.

IMBED was meant to reduce seek, and REPLICATE to reduce Latency. Thus the 
statement " have been obsoleted by newer, cached DASD devices" explains why 
they are no longer required.

Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 7:41 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Performance issues with VSAM IMBED
> 
> I have been reading the z/OS V1.7 to V1.9 Migration guide and though it
> states you do not need to remove IMBED, REPLCIATE or KEYRANGE.  It does
> mention that there is a performance issue by having them on your VSAM
> files.
> 
> I was wondering if anyone did an analysis to see what the buy back for
> VSAM response was if these are removed?  It would help me build a case
> to get the VSAM data sets reorged more quickly.  My VSAM seems to be
> strictly IMBED at this time.  I did not find any KEYRANGE or REPLICATE
> definitions.
> 
> Redefine existing VSAM data sets that contain the IMBED, REPLICATE, and
> KEYRANGE attributes
> 
> Description: No supported release of z/OS honors the IMBED, REPLICATE,
> and KEYRANGE attributes for new VSAM data sets. In fact, using these
> attributes can waste DASD space and often degrades performance.
> Servicing these VSAM data sets has become increasingly difficult. In
> some cases, unplanned outages have occurred. For these reasons, IBM
> recommends that you stop using IMBED and REPLICATE, and that you
> minimize or eliminate your use of KEYRANGE. IMBED and REPLICATE were
> intended as performance improvements and have been obsoleted by newer,
> cached DASD devices. Striped data sets provide much better performance
> than KEYRANGE and should be viewed as a candidate for any existing
> KEYRANGE data sets.
> 
> 
> Is the migration action required?
> No, but recommended to avoid degraded performance and wasted DASD
> space.
> 
> 
> Any comments are always welcomed.
> 
> Lizette
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to