LDMF Version 2. May actually have a name change in the near future. Tom Moulder
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinnacle Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 12:07 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: LDMF vs. FDRMOVE (was: Shark to EMC) > > Everyone else has answered well what can be used to move the data from one > place to another. The only thing I would add to that list is LDMF should > you desire a change between disk models during the conversion. FDRPAS and > TDMF will not move at the data set level to fully use larger model disks > with data sets from many smaller volumes. LDMF will do this without an > outage to the owning application. FDRMOVE is similar to LDMF in function > not in the method of delivering the function and does require an outage to > accomplish the move. > Since when does LDMF not require an outage to the owning application? There is no HIPERSWAP at the dataset level, so both LDMF and FDRMOVE may require an outage if the dataset is continuously enqueued. Let me know if I missed something about LDMF. Regards, Tom Conley ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 9:29 AM No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.16/1251 - Release Date: 1/30/2008 9:29 AM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
