> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:23 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: JES2 NJE question: SNA(CTC) vs. TCPIP > > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/14/2008 > at 04:01 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >Class C 192-223 N.H.H.H > > Class C 192-223 N.N.N.H > > >I then looked it up in RFC 1918 > > You mean where it says "and third block is a set of 256 > contiguous class C > network numbers."? That would seem to say that 192.168/16 is > *not* a class > C network. > > >Either way, I think he did mean Class C. > > No, Class C is a /24, not a /16. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Yes, I meant a class C address (I'm the OP). I just put the address in wrong in my email. Actually, I meant an entire class C range dedicated to my Hipersocket connected internal network within this single CEC. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
