Bill, The Compile options I used with separate translator and EXEC DLI are:
TRUNC(BIN) DLL EXPORTALL PGMNAME(LONGMIXED) And on Binder options DYNAM(DLL),RENT,CASE(MIXED) I'm going to ask my supervisor if he would like me to attempt DLL's in CICS, as it sounds like you and IBM might be interested in results of it. Darren -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Klein Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Fw: COBOL Compiler options I know that you can't check it now, but are you saying that using the separate translator step, that you can compile a COBOL program with the following compiler options: NOCICS,NODLL,NODYNAM but use the binder option DYNAM(DLL) If so, then you probably can do that also with the integrated coprocessor (but I won't swear to it). If, however, you are saying that you can use the separate translator step and use the COBOL compiler options NOCICS,DLL,NODYNAM and this works "as expected" ar tun-time, then that is something that I (and suspect IBM) would be very interested in (when you have a chance to check it out). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
