I never said it would be better, I was just wondering if that was going to be the direction for what used to be done in ISPF dialogs. Things like ServerPac, Health Checker, Omegamon installer.
If history serves as any lesson, most attempts at any type of installation dialog usually fails (CA-AGGRAVATOR anyone?) as well as most other OEM installers. Give me an install lib and a list of jobs to run and I'll be just fine thank you. The exception at this point appears to be the ServerPac dialogs which actually appear to work nicely and properly the way they are. Altering them to use a web interface may work but why bother? Ken -----Original Message----- Shane On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 10:09 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: > I was thinking more along the lines of a local (z/OS based web) > interface instead of the current ISPF dialogs. A poorly designed (web) interface is a poorly designed interface. What gives you faith it will be any better designed just because it remains within a LAN ???. My sceptosity level remains elevated until disproved. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
