Compress across a large bandwidth pipe isn't the best solution....testing
bears out that Very little is gained with compress across say a T1 or
bigger.


Scott Ford
Senior Host Developer | Forging Enterprise Identity |  IdentityForge.com
(Main) 678.266.3399 x304 | (Cell) 609.346.0399 | (Fax) 678.266.3399
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
priviledged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete
the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 4:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Connect:Direct (NDM) CPU Usage

>If you are encrypting then you need to be careful with compression.
>Encrypted data is said to be generally not compressible.    

Compress first.
Then encrypt.
If I recall from my basic computer courses in the mid-1970's.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to