As DB2 guy, I used to religously use the CSVLLAxx member to avoid impacting others.
However, my main zos guru recommended to me a while back (maybe the last 2 ZOS releases?) that the benefits were so minimal now that it wasn't worth the effort to code the CSVLLA route any longer, and to just go ahead and do a total refresh each time. Anyone concur? We're 1.9, and YMMV of course, tom -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imbriale, Donald Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Update datasets defined in lnklst Rather than a total refresh of LLA, often F LLA,UPDATE=xx for the specific library has less impact on performance (construction of the CSVLLAxx member is an exercise left to the implementer). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
