Yes. The main difference is that SCLM uses binder INCLUDE command, while the batch program is using the object code as main input.
Itschak On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 5:58 PM, J R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you closely compared the SYSPRINT output > to check if the processing options differ in any way? > > > Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:34:16 +0300 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Linkage editor different ways to bind > > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > > > > I can't supply JCL for situation two, as this is dynamicly invoked by > SCLM. > > I plan to changed the IOTYPE from S to A and specify the object library > as > > the input, including member name. I read the DFSMS Program management > manual > > and have some ideas to check next week... > > > > Itschak > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get more out of the Web. Learn 10 hidden secrets of Windows Live. > > http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!550F681DAD532637!5295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
