On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:59:03 -0600, Arthur Gutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 07:58:52 +0100, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >>[...]when we got bitten by the very different naming conventions for DAE for >instance (which you cannot 'unshare'), [...], and most recently by RRS, or >rather the interaction between DB2, RRS and LOGR, and logstream offload for >RRS log streams on a connected system which is NOT the one that *should* >have done the offload. [...] >> >I forgot about DAE... You don't have to share DAE at all do you? At one point I had the same name across sysplexes (MIM shop) but they were different data sets. I also had different data sets within the same sysplex do to merging. Now the dsn is shared and has &SYSPLEX as part of the name. I never ran into any problems... So can't you set up DAE as not shared and have each system use its own (I realize you lose the sysplex wide benefit of DAE)? IOW, don't include SHARE in your ADYSETxx parms. It was a long time ago so I can't look back, but I thought that is what I did. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
