> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:23 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: ENQ a member of a PDS > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:56:31 -0700, Schwarz, Barry A wrote: > > >All of us whose workload would still fit on a 4381 but had to upgrade > to > >get around maintenance and support issues. Plus anyone still using a > >P390 or a FLEX-ES if I remember the literature correctly. And on the > z9 > >I support we have only one LPAR also. > > > The ply to which I replied said "multi-CPU". LPAR is different. > Is z9 marketed in a single-CPU version? P390 or FLEX-ES may be
2096-A01 30 Mips 4 MSU. I don't know how much useful work you can get out of it :) If I never see a uni-processor again, it's be too damn soon. > single-CPU, AFAIK. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Paul Gilmartin > >Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 5:06 PM > > > >Doesn't need to be multi-CPU; multi-task is bad enough. Who has > >a single-CPU system nowadays, anyway? > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
