Yogs, First thing I would stress is that there is no such thing as Omegamon. There are three distinct-but-related product FAMILIES:
Omegamon (classic) Omegamon II Omegamon XE Second thing I would stress is the need for a flexible, uniform, integrated set of monitors. Each software package has its better and worse points, which I would be glad to discuss individually if you're interested. IMHO, feature-by-feature comparisons are less important than the total solution. It depends on how the performance analyst's role is defined in your organization. db -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Yogeetha balasubramanian Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 8:41 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: TMON with OMEGAMON Comparison Hello there !! We are moving from TMON to OMEGAMON . Can someone tell me the difference from your experience between TMON and OMEGAMON that need to be considered ? We are collecting this information Which do you think is a better option. I felt OMEGAMON/CICS got a user friendly interface. Regards Yogs CICS Systems Programmer ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html