There are already facilities available for sharing data above the bar, why would IBM want to create an "LPA" which cannot contain executable code? How long would it take for some yahoo to put code there and try to execute it?
>>> "McKown, John" <jmck...@healthmarkets.com> 6/5/2009 12:54 PM >>> > I could see a use for load modules marked RMODE(64),OL, and > even for an enhanced LPA to support sharing them, without > the requirement for TCB, RB, etc. support. That might be the "first" to be implemented. For large, shared, read-only data tables. CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains confidential and privileged information intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you have received this material in error and that any forwarding, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the material is strictly prohibited. If you have received this material in error, please (i) do not read it, (ii) reply to the sender that you received the message in error, and (iii) erase or destroy the material. Emails are not secure and can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by email. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
