On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:32:39 -0400 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> wrote:
:>I got a cc 828 on the following clist code, and the %USERPROC executed :>even though the condition seems to be false. I tried adding &STR and :>enclosing parentheses, but neither helped. The explanation of 828 in the :>documentation was clear as mud: WTF is an "exclusive comparison operator" :>and in what context is only one allowed? :>IF (&STR(&SYSDSN(LIB.CLIST(USERPROC))) EQ &STR(OK)) | + :> (&STR(&SYSDSN(LIB.REXX(USERPROC))) EQ &STR(OK)) THEN + :> %USERPROC :>>From the manual: :> 828 | More than one exclusive comparison operator found. :> What does CONTROL CONLIST SYMLIST show? -- Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
