In
<3ebf9c9d119fd847b3a096c515a018f69486c...@surfsdvmp35.cnasurety.net>,
on 08/10/2012
at 03:50 PM, "Pommier, Rex R." <rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com> said:
>What would be the reason(s) for starting long-running tasks like CICS
>as a started task or a batch job?
START doesn't tie up an initiator, and there's one less jobstep task
in the address space.
>My foggy brain seems to remember there being issues with running
>multi-step started tasks,
If you require an entry in the PPT, the same restrictions apply for a
started task and a batch job.
>and something about there not being as much data gathered
There used to be an SMF restriction, but these days it's under parmlib
control.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
