On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Scott Ford <scott_j_f...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sam, > > I am curious was your CEEPIPI and assembler driver to call and establish > separate tasks? > Yes - From my reading of the DOC, each TCB can have a separate and independent LE ENCLAVE. This has proven to be true and works well. > > Scott ford > www.identityforge.com > > Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll > understand. - Chinese Proverb > > > On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Sam Siegel <s...@pscsi.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > > > >> I have a program written in LE C++ that is among other usages designed > to > >> be > >> callable from a COBOL (or potentially other LE) program. I recently > changed > >> the program to run POSIX(ON) because it is now sometimes calling the GSK > >> crypto routines. > >> > >> Now, when I call it from a COBOL program I get the following error: > >> > >> CEE3648S POSIX(ON) run-time option in a nested > >> enclave enclave-name is not supported. > >> Explanation: In Language Environment, a process can > >> have only one enclave that is running with POSIX(ON), > >> and that enclave must be the first enclave. All nested > >> enclaves must be running with POSIX(OFF). > >> Programmer response: Specify the POSIX(ON) > >> run-time option for only the first enclave. Make sure all > >> nested enclaves specify POSIX(OFF). > >> System action: The application will be terminated. > >> > >> Is it truly the case that a POSIX(ON) main program can't be invoked from > >> another LE program? That seems kind of restrictive given that a number > of C > >> library functions require POSIX(ON). > > > > I ran into that problem with a bunch of C/C++ code that needed to be > > POSIX(ON). Same requirement, the C/C++ needed to be callable from > > non-POSIX COBOL. > > > > My solution was to put the C/C++ in a seperate TCB and use CEEPIPI in > that > > TCB to start a new LE ENCLAVE. > > > > > >> > >> I gather it's also not possible to turn POSIX on programmatically, is > that > >> correct? It has to be set either with a #pragma or one of the CEEOPTS > type > >> methods, is that right? > >> > >> Charles > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > >> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
