I really appreciate the flexibility IBM demonstrates in the last sentence: Be running with POSIX(ON) and have set the environment variables to signal that you want to establish a nested enclave. You can use the __POSIX_SYSTEM environment variable to cause a system() to establish a nested enclave instead of performing a fork()/exec(). __POSIX_SYSTEM can be set to NO, No, or no.
:-( Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Sam Siegel Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Nested enclaves and POSIX(ON) On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Scott Ford <scott_j_f...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Sam, > > I am curious was your CEEPIPI and assembler driver to call and establish > separate tasks? > Yes - From my reading of the DOC, each TCB can have a separate and independent LE ENCLAVE. This has proven to be true and works well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
