I am fluent in C/C++ and have a fast checksum in my bag of tricks, FWIW. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 11:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: How do people lock down the compilers "inside" CA Endevor? Interesting idea. If encryption is "overkill", then perhaps a simple checksum such as used by cksum. Very easy to do if the OP has a C compiler since there are so many examples on the Web. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Thomas Berg <thomas.b...@swedbank.se>wrote: > You got a couple of answers from those with knowledge. As they were > not quite positive I may chirp in with the suggestion of obfuscation. > E g encrypt a part or the whole of program X and let program Y decrypt > that at execution time. The decryption key and decryption routine may > be arbitrarily obfuscated. > (This of course assumes that program X can be changed in that way.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
