On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:58:07 +0000, Lars Höglund wrote: > >You can use SETMSG even in batch that's why ISPMLIB > What is its effect?
>-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >Fr�n: Seymour J Metz >Skickat: den 11 januari 2021 18:39 > >Why a separate allocation step? > >Why 3120 for ISPPROF? > BLKSIZE(0)? How old is that code? What portable UNIT esoteric is advised for a temp DSN? ------------------------------------------ On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:43:09 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >ISPF has an ISPEXEC command in support of clists; '"ISPEXEC CONTROL ERRORS >RETURN"' is equivalent to 'ADDRESS ISPEXEC "CONTROL ERRORS RETURN"' with more >overhead. That rc 20 means that it is not running under ISPF. Under ISPF, the >initial environment is ISPEXEC. > I thought, TSO. Silly design. A mischievous developer might create a command environment named ADDRESS with an ADDRESS command so: address ADDRESS 'ADDRESS' ... would work without error. Contrariwise, when I used CMS/370 ISPF many decades ago, ADDRESS ISREDIT was mis-implemented. Something like: address ISREDIT 'MACRO' "RC(-3)" ... but: address ISREDIT 'ISREDIT MACRO' ... succeeded. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN