I can’t recall a policy other than a shift to Object Code Only where the 
internals became opaque

Matt Hogstrom
m...@hogstrom.org
+1-919-656-0564
PGP Key: 0x90ECB270
Facebook <https://facebook.com/matt.hogstrom>  LinkedIn 
<https://linkedin/in/mhogstrom>  Twitter <https://twitter.com/hogstrom>

“It may be cognitive, but, it ain’t intuitive."
— Hogstrom

> On Apr 15, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 11:37:32 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> I'm editing the wikipedia [[Operating system]] article, and another editor 
>> has challenged the sentence "The logic manuals for their 
>> contemporary descendants, z/VM, z/VSE and z/VM, are not available to the 
>> general public." What are the relevant URLs for IBM's 
>> policy? Thanks.
> 
> I've never heard of such a policy.
> 
> z/VM stopped publishing its PLMs because the effort to maintain them exceeded 
> their value.   A vendor who needs information about z/VM internals uses their 
> PartnerWorld relationship to obtain it.  That said, for historical reasons 
> the PLM for CP still exists internally.  I know because I made a large update 
> to it just a handful of years ago, but it's already out of date again.   But 
> it's nice to hand it to a new hire and point to the parts that are still good.
> 
> Even though z/VM doesn't publish a PLM, it still publishes most of the source 
> code for CP and CMS.  Not surprisingly, we exclude any source code that uses 
> unpublished elements of z/Architecture ("not otherwise described in this 
> publication"), uses unpublished device interfaces, or that contains other 
> protected intellectual property.   
> 
> Tied to that are source code updates that are included with PTFs, but that's 
> really shipped only because we'd have to stick our fingers in the spinning 
> fan blades of the long-established maintenance process to stop it.  If we 
> ever change the way we maintain the system in the field, those source code 
> updates may well end.  But that's again a case where the only people who care 
> are a few vendors, and they have other resources at their disposal.
> 
> z/VM customer sysprogs in 2022 do not modify or extend CP or CMS, and the 
> customers do not want their IT managers to also be in the software 
> development business.  Governance rules related to off-the-shelf hardware and 
> software have moved to the forefront, and you can't hold the vendor liable if 
> you have broken the warranty seal.
> 
> And we don't want sysprogs wasting time trying to shoot a dump.  That's what 
> they pay IBM to do and the sooner they get the dump to us, the sooner we can 
> fix the problem. 
> 
> Alan Altmark
> IBM
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to