Without meaning to bump into what might be off topic, SYSCALL is actually a CLIST instruction - not a REXX one (unless it's a case of "nous avons changé tout ça") E.g. HELP_SELECT: + SELECT (&ZCMD) WHEN (UP) DO SET HPAN = &HPAN - 1 *SYSCALL* MAXV HPAN HELPTOP ENDO WHEN (DOWN) DO SET HPAN = &HPAN + 1 *SYSCALL* MINV HPAN HELPBOT ENDO OTHERWISE ENDO HELP_SELECT ISPEXEC DISPLAY PANEL(HELPANL&HPAN) ENDO <...> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* SUB-PROCEDURE MINV */ /*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/ MINV: + PROC 0 + HPAN HELPBOT CONTROL END(ENDO) SYSREF + HPAN HELPBOT IF &STR(&HPAN) > &STR(&HELPBOT) THEN + SET HPAN = &HELPBOT ELSE RETURN ENDO MINV /*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* SUB-PROCEDURE MAXV */ /*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/ MAXV: + PROC 0 + HPAN HELPTOP CONTROL END(ENDO) SYSREF + HPAN HELPTOP IF &STR(&HPAN) < &STR(&HELPTOP) THEN + SET HPAN = &HELPTOP ELSE RETURN ENDO MAXV <etc.>
On 07/07/2022 19:01, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > (This thread should move to comp.lang.advocacy.) > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 16:40:08 +0000, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: > >> OK, I'll bite: What is BSF please? I do know of PCRE (though I really do >> not like the Perl RE syntax, I prefer Posix/gawk RE syntax) but BSF is a new >> acronym to me. >> > I try to keep my skill set portable. I avoid Bash-isms, {g|n}awk, ... Now > that you say PCRE > is different, my interest in it is diminished. > > It seems to me that many users of {g|n}awk learned a primitive awk lacking > many features > such as tolowerr(), touppor(), the "in" operator, ... now assimilated in > POSIX awk. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN