On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 12:31:00 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: >This is a case of documentation attempting to replicate information in other >documentation. Even when the author gets it right initially, the documentation >is always at risk of being blindsided by future changes. I see this all of the >time in IBM documentation that (incorrectly) gives rules for other components, >e.g., language processor documentation that incorrectly describes JCL. > Does anyone but you and me see this as a defect?
How should I phrase an RCF? >________________________________________ >From: Paul Gilmartin >Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 2:46 PM > >>/F procname,'How now, Brown Cow' >>App received 'How now, Brown Cow' >> > Operator commands may contain the following characters: > A to Z > 0 to 9 > ' # $ & ( ) * + , - . / � < | ! ; � % _ > ? : @ " = > The system translates characters that are not valid into null characters (X'00'). >No space; no lower case. Should I look elsewhere or submit an RCF? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
