Are you talking about a scenario where you can't reproduce the ABEND in the recopmiled version? If not, why do you want the old symbol table, etc.?
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Tom Marchant [0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 2:41 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LE runtime Yes, it will. And if you are debugging an abend that occurred with an older version of the program, the listing is no longer available in the program object. -- Tom Marchant On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 18:33:18 +0000, Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: >Won't that replace the NOLOAD segments with the new ones? > > >-- >Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz >http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > >________________________________________ >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of >Tom Marchant [0000000a2a8c2020-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] >Sent: Friday, April 7, 2023 2:31 PM >To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >Subject: Re: LE runtime > >Until the program is recompiled and relinked. > >-- >Tom Marchant > >On Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:48:04 -0700, Tom Ross <tmr...@stlvm20.vnet.ibm.com> >wrote: > >>With the >>NOLOAD class program segmenets in new COBOL the debugging data is always >>available, always in sync ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
