ANY and ALL intercommunication brings risk.
DISABLING it has COSTS. We use computers from the get-go for the sake of
AUTOMATION.
Disabling copy-n-paste does not prevent your fingers typing what you see
on the screen (either direction).
Disabling your fingers would render you measurably less productive. If
disabling copy-n-paste renders you less productive, you have an argument
that you need to take to upper manglement.
As a security professional, I see a lot of over-reach in "solutions" to
these risks. We protect the wrong things.
(If you need a shoulder to cry on, I'm here. Wish I could do more to
help, but mob psychology is working against us.)
-- R; <><
On 4/17/23 06:52, Jack Zukt wrote:
Hi all,
This is way off topic, sorry, but I am curious, so please be patient
In one of the clients for which I have to work the Auditors found out that
the Copy/Paste between the client Citrix session and our PCs is a risk and
the client disabled the function.
Has anyone else ever has such an issue?
Regards,
Jack
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
