For transient SVC name it was a trailing C0; I was just contrasting member names with index levels. I guess that IBM decided to eliminate an alleged ambiguity between member name and relative generation.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Paul Gilmartin [0000042bfe9c879d-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 10:55 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Two related member generation questions On Wed, 31 May 2023 11:57:07 +0000, Seymour J Metz wrote: > >I don't recall leading braces or hyphens in qualifiers, > Leading? In member names? I was told it was the result of UNPK of a SVC number. > ... but leading hyphens in member names used to work, and I was unhappy when > IBM tightened the validity check in the C/I. > They should have gone the other way and allowed quoting the member name. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
